Re: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 16:33:20 -0500

Hi!

Good, points. Fear is one thing, terror is another. I will get into an
extensive re-wording of the chaos book to reflect all this. As for the
core rules, the morale section will be expanded to include "morale
saves" and "morale checks".

Peter

jyrki.saari_at_... wrote:

> Maybe it would be test to differentiate between morale and terror tests.
> Both are made the same way but are two different things, so confessor would
> make unit immune to MORALE tests but not TERROR tests. Currently the wording
> of chaos and tyranid critters states that a unit must take MORALE test when
> it is, in fact, a TERROR test.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
> money.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ext Peter Ramos [mailto:primarch_at_...]
>> Sent: 05. March 2001 19:35
>> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Conflicting Rules
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> This is the correct interpretation. I agree that perhpas the wording
>> should be changed in the case when a unit uses ita morale
>> stat as a save
>> and not as a check. So units with a confessor would not make "morale
>> checks", but chaos powers would induce "a save with its morale as the
>> target number".
>>
>> Is this a better wording?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> quester wrote:
>>
>>> The power would over ride the rule becouse it is using you moral
>>> leavel as a save not as a brake test This applyes to all GW games
>>> sence they cabined willpower and leadership stats
>>>
>>> The power should be worded as take a willpower test by using the
>>> target brake test number
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>> nils.saugen_at_... wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This Topic is a real pain for me. There are rules that
>>
>> come into
>>
>>> conflict
>>> with each other, most often these revolve around moral testes.
>>>
>>> For instance if you include a Confessor in a
>>
>> detachment, the rules
>>
>>> state
>>> that that detachement he joins won't make a moral check for any
>>> reason. Then
>>> you have Chaos powers that state that every unit, even
>>
>> those that
>>
>>> normaly
>>> don't take moral tests, should make a moral test. There are
>>> several excaples
>>> of this "Conflict of Moral", which rule should take presidens?
>>>
>>> Nils
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>>
>>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>>> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RuneSmith Studio "we bring the art to war"
>>>
>>> 15 Summit Ave.
>>>
>>> Albany, NY. 12209
>>>
>>> http://odin.prohosting.com/quester6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Yahoo! Mail Personal Address
>>> <http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/?.refer=mailiyfoot> - Get email at
>>> your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
>>> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>>> [AirForce.com]
>>>
>> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=182283.1338155.2932296/D=egroupmail/S=1
>
> 700059081:N/A=597632/*http://www.airforce.com/cgi-bin/media/setmedia.cgi?med
> ia=YH02Q201>
>
>>
>> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>>
>> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
>> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 06 2001 - 21:33:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:18 UTC