Hi!
I think that since the original boxes brought marines a lot of people
have this army, but that would explain why orks are just as popular.
Again GW has had a "imperial" slant for a long time and kind of
pushes these armies more.
What was surprising was a strong showing for the squats (third
place), not bad for an army you can't get stuff anymore.
Peter
--- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> This was not suprising. It seems like peolpe like playing the
easiest and most straight forward armies. If anyone is up for
investing in a new army, I would recomend the Slann. We have done a
great deal of work on it, and reduced their gorgonzola aroma to a
minimum. :-)
>
> I have been one of the foremosts qritisists of this army, but now I
think its quite fun to play up against.
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: netepic_at_y...
> > Dato: 2001/05/16 Wed PM 11:14:58 CEST
> > Til: netepic_at_y...
> > Emne: [NetEpic ML] Poll results for netepic
> >
> >
> > The following netepic poll is now closed. Here are the
> > final results:
> >
> >
> > POLL QUESTION: What epic armies do you play? (you may
> > choose all that apply).
> >
> > CHOICES AND RESULTS
> > - Space marines, 17 votes, 22.67%
> > - Imperial Guard, 16 votes, 21.33%
> > - Eldar, 7 votes, 9.33%
> > - Squats, 9 votes, 12.00%
> > - Orks, 8 votes, 10.67%
> > - Tyranids, 5 votes, 6.67%
> > - Slann, 3 votes, 4.00%
> > - Chaos, 7 votes, 9.33%
> > - Planetary defense forces/SOB, 3 votes, 4.00%
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information about this group, please visit
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/netepic
> >
> > For help with Yahoo! Groups, please visit
> > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
Received on Fri May 18 2001 - 13:53:47 UTC