Hi!
while it may cost 300 points it would yield around 5VP as a squat
army card.
Peter
--- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> Well, the pointcost for a regular robot detatchment with 100% BP is
100, so therefore, a company should cost 300.
>
> What you probably is thinking is that it can be very difficult to
kill all 15 'bots, and I might just agree that this could be somewhat
au de gorgonzola.
>
> On the other hand, its quite difficult to hide robots as they must
go on their prewritten programs, you cant change it, so it is nearly
impossible to hide one or two remaining 'bots behind a building or
something.
>
> I'm not quite sure myself if this unit should see the light of day,
Im not even sure I would use it if it did. I just wanted some
opinions on it....
>
> Eivind
> >
> > Fra: Trygve Bj�rnstad <trygve_at_n...>
> > Dato: 2001/06/07 Thu PM 02:38:28 CEST
> > Til: <netepic_at_y...>
> > Emne: RE: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Shouldn't the high break point also affect the cost of the unit?
> >
> > Trygve
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: primarch_at_b... [mailto:primarch_at_b...]
> > > Sent: 7. juni 2001 14:30
> > > To: netepic_at_y...
> > > Subject: Re: Sv: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > This has precedent in epic already. The spirit host company in
the
> > > eldar list is only broken when the command unit dies, virtually
100%.
> > > If you do this remember to raise the VP total appropriately as
per
> > > other squat cards.
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In netepic_at_y..., <eivind.borgeteien_at_c...> wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > > Glad you liked the unit!
> > > >
> > > > I have also made a "standard" robot company comprising of
> > > >
> > > > 3 robot detachments (5 robots)
> > > > BP 15
> > > > VP 3
> > > > Points 300
> > > >
> > > > Would this bee a too cheesy unit with the 100% breakpoint?
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Eivind
> > > > >
> > > > > Fra: jyrki.saari_at_n...
> > > > > Dato: 2001/06/07 Thu AM 08:54:05 CEST
> > > > > Til: netepic_at_y...
> > > > > Emne: RE: [NetEpic ML] Optional Squat Unit
> > > > >
> > > > > I love this! Fits extremely well with the Squat fluff; I
think
> > > robots would
> > > > > be excellent tunnel fighters and that's just the kind of
thing
> > > Squats would
> > > > > have.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Jyrki Saari
> > > > >
> > > > > -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes
time
> > > and time is
> > > > > money.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [snipped a good unit]
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-
unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
Received on Thu Jun 07 2001 - 16:24:27 UTC