Re: [Epic] SM/TL Chaos units

From: Mark A Shieh <SHODAN+_at_...>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:32:52 -0400 (EDT)

David Lado <lado_at_...> writes:
(actually, he didn't, Agro did)
> >I ask because the whole "conflicting rules" thing about Epic 2nd Edition is
> >a beat up in my opinion.
>
> >In my opinion there are huge sections of the rules that ARE NOT SENSIBLE,
> >but there are actualy no "conflicting rules" whatsoever...

        What, before or after the horrible mess that was the SM/TL
Q&A? (It's well done Allen, but it shouldn't have to be that large in
the first place)
        If you say after, I might almost agree with you. I think
there may be one or two more conflicts to dig up, but we may have
managed to find all of them.

        Before, I remember the argument of "Is a unit that cannot move
for the rest of the turn due to a Wave Serpent hit immobilized?" I
personally felt that the two were synonymous, but apparently they're
just a bit confused, not actually paralyzed. Each of us who were
around then can probably bring up some "conflicting rules". There
were so many ultimate powers and immovable objects in the game to
figure out interactions for, as both of them just can't function at
the same time.

Mark
Received on Wed Jul 30 1997 - 14:32:52 UTC