> >I think that's plenty for the moment. If you want, I can write up
> >the other
> >one too; the defender won that one fair and square, however you do
> >the
> >victory points (although we were doing one of the rules wrong).
> >
> >Eugene
> >
>
> Of course I want to read what you can post about the other battle!
>
> I would like to translate your idea into French for my site, do you
> agree?
>
> Francois Bruntz
> Apprenti MIAGE (Universite Paris XII - IBM France)
>
> Please visit my Epic page :
> http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Dungeon/2370/
>
Yeah, sure, you (and anyone else who wants to) can translate any of my
postings on this mailing list for use on any epic-related site.
I'll see when I can get around to doing the next one; I'm too busy today
(and it's too late), but tomorrow, perhaps...
Incidentally, on tuesday, my friends and I played an epic 40k game with
FOUR separate sides. It was nuts, but it actually worked really well; it
was cooler in many ways than a three side game because everybody fought
everybody else. The epic 40k morale system really lends itself to
multi-side games, because instead of gaining points for breaking enemy
detachments (and the attendant difficulty of deciding which player gets the
points), the person who got shot up loses the points instead, meaning the
system can be used as is without tinkering. Initiative was the tricky part;
if people want, I can post the rules we used for the game at a later date.
Not now, though, now I have to go to sleep...
Regards, Eugene
Received on Wed Jul 31 2097 - 06:42:16 UTC