Re: [Epic] An off-topic question about Battletech

From: sauron1 <sauron1_at_...>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 1997 19:59:32 -0400

----------
> From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: Re: [Epic] An off-topic question about Battletech
> Date: August 1, 1997 10:35 AM
>
> At 02:12 PM 1/8/97 +0200, you wrote:
> >I know this isn't the right list for this, and that there is a
Battletech
> >mailing list, but I want a neutral analysis.
> >It seems that there are several veteran wargamers on this list, so they
> >probably can answer my question. What do you think about the Battletech
> >board game? I heard someone saying it gets boring after half an hour,
and
> >that it all comes down to: who shoots first, wins. Any opinions?
>
>
> Well, that comment applies more to EPIC than to battletech.
>
> In Battletech, all fire is simultaneous so that even if something is
> destroyed, it still completes the fire phase before it is removed...
>
> The book keeping can be a bit of a pain, but it is a really good game and
> you should get hours of fun from it.
>
> I like the rule set pre Clan Tech (the Clan Mechs might be compatible
with
> each other, but they sure aren't compatible with the so called Inner
Sphere
> Mechs...)
>
> Agro
>
>
>
> >
> >E-mail me privatly, so that this topic doesn't waste any more bandwidth
of
> >this list than necessary. Thanks.
> ><koen.devroey_at_...>
> >
> >Greetings,
> >Koen.
> >
> >
>
Sauron1 writes;The actual robots,would they be small enough to use as a new
opponent in Epic?And would weapon conversion be to rough a row to hoe?
sauron1
Received on Fri Aug 01 1997 - 23:59:32 UTC