RE: [Epic] Engines of Vaul??? Ha!

From: james nugent <jnug1453_at_...>
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 07:41:02 -0400

> > That is the strength of the ork, there are simply a green wave
that >k=
eeps comming. Also, because of shear numbers they can muster
some >decent f=
irepower.
>
> As I said, simple tactics. There are a number of counters tho=
ugh,
which
> a player of high ability will have that will cut through them =
like
> butter.
>
> For example:
>
> Eldar Engines of Vaul. Pop-up Engines, =
immune to all fire except from
> other War Engines.
>
>

I'll only say one =
thing: 10 siege artillery units on overwatch.

Rundown:
10 siege artillery=
 units fire at a detachment of Engines of Vaul (say
three vehicles), out of=
 cover (artillery shells _do_ come from above,
remember), giving a total FP=
 of 20 (assume that they are more than 6cm
apart). This will give an avera=
ge of 8 1/3 hits. These will cause 8
1/3 points of damage, and will also i=
nflict an average of 1 7/18
critical hits (wich will have an 81% chance of =
destroying one
vehicle). So you have now given each vehicle approx. 3 poin=
ts of
damage, and have probably severely damaged or even destroyed 1 or 2 o=
f
them. Give them 2 detachments of 10 siege artillery units and they
will =
certainly die.

And if two of those Engines of Vaul are under one template,=
 goodnight
all from _one_ artillery detachment.

Sigh, yeah. Eldar would be=
 cool it they actaully had things with armour. It's not good when your stuf=
f is expensive AND wimpy. Cheap and wimp works. The opposite does not.
----=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------------
"Your incorrect assumptions are threefold."=

"You assume law still reigns in the Five Galaxies"
"You assume that we wou=
ld be bound by precedents and precepts from the last 10 million years."
"Bu=
t your most incorrect assumption of all is to assume that we care."
                                        =
-David Brin, Infinity's Shore
---------------------------------------------=
--------James Nugent----------------------------------------





Received on Mon Aug 04 1997 - 11:41:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:43 UTC