Re: [Epic] Epic 40k rumours

From: Charlie Wells <jaw_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 15:28:49 -0500

Jason Stephensen wrote:
>
> >> I treat this just as rumours - even though it came from a GWUK mail order
> >> person - and would not want to put any money on the veracity of the info
> >> listed above. But I thought some of the list members might want to start
> >> saving even now :-)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Oki
> >Hmmph..Why redo the whole game? It just doesnt make sense to
> >me...Facelift yes, new game no. (Directed at GW, not you OKI)
>
> I totally agree. However as GW always answers that they are a business and
> not there for the gamers they will always change their systems every 3 or 4
> years to drag more money out of us. They've done it before, they'll do it again.
>
> Then again I believe that part of the success/failure of epic is the
> inabaility of porr commanders to cheese out units so they have to think in
> the game. 40K heads can't handle this and so don't support it. Answer to
> making them buy it -> make it like 40K. Bang, good system traded in for bad
> system, so GW make more money.
>
> OTOH some of the things in this rumour were quite heartening. The no army
> supplements to follow would be a good thing.
> ============================================================
> Colonel Abrahms, 22nd NU-Atol Regiment
> Rekartot Redbacks Senior Coach
> "No Spanky, No. Bad monkey"
> =========================================================
> email J.Stephensen_at_...
True, all too true...
Received on Wed Jan 29 1997 - 20:28:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:04 UTC