RE: [Epic] Couple Questions

From: Miller, Chris <CMiller_at_...>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 15:08:30 -0500

>>
>> ------> And I would add: For WHFB are the new High Elves tougher/better/
>> up-rated over the old HE's. I think so. Are the Dark Elves better than
>> the Old
>> High Elves - I think Yes. I think you have some degree of rules creep.
>> (I use the two most comparable example I know of for FB)
>>
>The opposite applies for 40K, Eldar and SW, the first two are a
>considerable amount more powerful than others, Dark angels and
>ultramarines are ridiculously fair, and Tyranids are quite bad. SoB I
>have yet to play, but with three units how good can they be.
>Steve
>
>--
-----> Yep, the UM's are fine, but they're supposed to be the standards.
I have heard some grumbling about the BA Death Co, but the DA's
I have yet to hear too much about. I hear gripes about 'Nids,too oddly
enough, so some of this may depend on who/how you play, but I
would say GW has a pattern of complicating things they've already
done well once (or twice) to the point the system starts to stagger
under its own weight, neccessitating a new edition...

Chris Miller
(Chaos also gets nailed as too powerful, but I think the 40K codex
forcing players to summon their demons evens things out a bit. Actually
helps them in some cases...)
Received on Tue Sep 16 1997 - 20:08:30 UTC