Re: [Epic] Net epic

From: Chris Swearingen <tall-guy_at_...>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:46:22 -0800

howdy, all!
i'm an FNG on this site, but have been playing SM/Epic for many years...
started right at the transition from 1st to 2nd ed.

so why reinvent the sytem? several of my friends and i still use 1st ed
sequence of play, and have even added the same type of rulings as you,
with each side alternating unit movement within each phase.

it works quite well and gives a *much* better feel for integrated move and
fire
(as an aside, i even convinced some of them to use the same sequence for
40K with excellent results! thats how i lured some of them into Epic!)

>
> THIS WEEKS TOPIC: MOVEMENT AND INITIATIVE
>
> I still remember when second edition was new and after a few games,
> although the rules were superior to those of 1st edition, there were
> some thing found lacking. Foremost on that list was the movement and
> initiative.
>
>
> UNIT COHERENCY
>
no need to change
>
> ORDERS
> In the older edition orders were revealed as the unit was activated

this could be quite fun with your system!
>
>
> THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT GENTLEMEN-FIRE AWAY
>
one other major change that is lacking in2nd ed... flavor text!
just let a new guy read the old epic rule book flavor portions
and you have an avid gamer for life!

good fun to all

Chris Swearingen
tall-guy_at_...

"my brain hurts!"
"well,... it will have to come out then!"
Received on Wed Feb 05 1997 - 01:46:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:05 UTC