Re: [Epic] Epic 41K Rule changes

From: Eugene Earnshaw-Whyte <eug_at_...>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 20:27:49 -0700

Mark A Shieh wrote:

> Eugene Earnshaw-Whyte <eug_at_...> writes:
>
> >
> > I think Epic 41k should revise the cost of IG command stands - it's a
> > scandal.Thanks for keeping on putting out stuff; it's a pleasure to read
> > well thought out variant rules and army lists.
>
> I think that they should be left alone. Why is it part of
> E41k? Put it in a list of house rules that you use, along with 50
> point Farseers (25 + 25 to upgrade to HQ), and place the article next
> to the E41k rules, but it doesn't seem like a core part of E41k.
>
> Mark

What exactly is E41k, if not a list of house rules? I think the need for a new
IG infantry det. list is pressing. What is the 'core part' of E41k? What
should be excluded from it?

Eugene
Received on Wed Oct 08 1997 - 03:27:49 UTC