RE: [Epic] The Dark Angels

From: Chris White <chris_at_...>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 08:38:54 -0700

At 02:33 PM 10/9/97 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>>I am not entirely sure why I am doing it??? Gives me something to paint I
>>guess. It would be cool though. IF I get it all done (Big IF) I will get
>>some photos done. I might get some photos done as I finish companies.
>
>Tell GW about it. They might help out with some figures (yeah, right) or
>get some photos done for WD. This is the sort of thing they are looking for
>in the UK, to make the company seem more 'gamer-friendly'.
>
>***************
>
>Someone else (sorry) said:
>>
>> The whole E40K exercise is nothing more than an attempt to extort (I'm
>> pretty sure that that is the correct term) money from the gaming
fraternity.
>>
>
>For once, I disagree. The EPIC rules needed a radical overhaul, so the
>games developers pushed the executives to allow it. I don't think it was a
>case of 'we're not getting as much money out of the EPIC players as we
>might; let's tweak it a bit and rerelease'.
>
        <snip>

        I agree with the principal of redesigning the game to streamline it. But
if their motives were entirely altruistic, why did they increase their
prices for basic troops so much?

        <snip>
>Cheers,
>
>NRT
>
>Panda Mating Fails; Veterinarian Takes Over
>
>
>


Nickles
Received on Thu Oct 09 1997 - 15:38:54 UTC