Re: Sv: [Epic] New Eldar Minis & WD

From: Andy Skinner <askinner_at_...>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 08:46:54 -0500

Jon Nielsen wrote:
> Chris Pinson wrote:
> > (just once I'd love to see in a WD article someone saying, "Yeah, this
> > sucks, don't ever actually use it
>
> They did this in WD215!!!
> Andy C. wrote a small note on page 99 saying how he hates
> Vortex missiles. He suggests a max. of one Deathstrike per
> det. or they be treated as D6 A.T. shots. He's saying GW made
> a mistake!!! Maby I'll cut out the page and hang it on the wall!!

I don't know--isn't this a recommendation of Deathstrikes to most
GW players? :-) He didn't say it wasn't good enough so don't
bother. He said it was too good to use.

D6 AT shots under a template, or just D6 AT shots? I'd hate to see
a big fat missile turned into D6 AT shots anywhere.

If they're too powerful as a template's worth of death rays, are
they priced fairly for a template of AT shots? (Just replacing
2+ with 4+.)

[Just saw the rest of the messages about this. I was misunderstanding--
I had not realized that it was d6 DR per unit under the template. Wow!
That's way overkill. I thought it was one DR per unit under the
template.
There is almost no reason for more. Well, I guess the d6 makes it good
vs. War Engines. Elias, yes, it sounds like d6 AT is fine, I'd be happy
with that as a house rule.]

andy

-- 
Andy Skinner
askinner_at_...
Received on Mon Nov 17 1997 - 13:46:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:03 UTC