Re: [Epic] WD Battle Reports

From: Daniel Bond <danbond_at_...>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 1997 02:15:49 -0800 (PST)

---Scott Shupe <shupes_at_...> wrote:
>
> A. Allen McCarley wrote:
> >
> > Oh well, put your thinking caps on. I for one, look forward to
seeing the
> > WD which includes the IG battle report that is sure to follow the
new IG sprue.
> > I'd like to see how the game designers envision the proper design
of an IG
> > army.
>
> Probably by taking one or two of everything that's available,
> just like they do with any army in any battle report. The reports
> are pretty useless when it comes to army design tips.
>
> Scott Shupe
> shupes_at_... shupes@...
http://www.rpi.edu/~shupes
>
***********************************************************************
> "I felt like I was becoming scientifically interesting." - Heart of
> Darkness
>
the i.g army in the battle report in 216 consists of troops, plus an
allied squadron of imperial fists. I cannot remember the rest of the
army, but there was a detachment of 2 shadowswords and 1 baneblade
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free _at_... address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Wed Nov 26 1997 - 10:15:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:04 UTC