Re: [Epic] New to list . . . want some opinions.

From: Thane Morgan <thane_at_...>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 1997 00:25:47 -0700

> > > 3)We've seen many games come down to who pulled the initiative chit for the assault phase; the guy who won initiative crushed the guy
> didn't, even when the forces seemed equal.
> > It needs a skilled commander to prevent this.
> >> Thats a cop-out answer. Both of us are regarded highly for our wargaming skills, so if you could be a little more specific and less
> condescending, that would be cool... Careful-both those lines tend to be inflamatory. The 'it needs a
commander' is kind of like the 'hey lucky dice rolls can fix any
imbalance' line
 we get fed occasionally (ok its not quite so bad but yes it IS avoiding
question). On the other hand the 'Im a butt kicking wargaming legend'
kind of
speech often tends to degenerate into queries about just how useless the
opponents are or just how ruthlessly the expert in quetion is willing to
his army lists. Heck you might be the modern day Napoleon but its
youll ever be able to prove it. Hmmmm that wasnt overly nice of me now -
not trying to start a bunch of flaming here so before anyone does Ill
to anyone who may feel slighted (especially if they see my point).

That does it, your country's first on my list. Which one is it, anyway?

Thane " Don't Call Me Shorty" Morgan
Received on Mon Dec 08 1997 - 07:25:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:06 UTC