Re: [Epic] COMMENTS PLEASE

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 03:59:05 +0100 (MET)

At 05:03 PM 9/1/98 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I'm considering putting up a thread here on making Chaos armies for
>>40k.
>>> Please let me know if you think that it's a good idea.
>>>
>>> P.S. I'll throw in ideas for titans to keep it Epicy
>>>
>>> Signed
>>> Peter the Shadow Inquisitor
>>
>>
>>If it is for Chaos Epic 40K then no objections, but if it is for Chaos
>>Warhammer 40K (even if it has got a little bit of titans thrown in to make
>>it Epicy ?) then put it on the 40K mailing list.
>>a) You'll get more and probably better responses from a list that deals with
>>40K rather than one where only some of the players play 40K.
>>b) Myself, and a few others I know couldn't give a rat's arse (meant
>>politely) about 40K and don't want to read about on an Epic list.
>>
>
> (snip)
>
> Few faults with your (no offence) suggestions
>
> 1. Can't get through to the 40k list since I'm subscribed to the
digest
> mode.
>
> 2. I'm scared about doing the normal mode since it'll double the
e-mails
> I allready get (about 100+ after)
>
> 3. I could do it as a group thread (you know were you type in several
> addresses on the sending e-mail) but I'm not shure if it'll work.
> (for example Sauronl sent me a private email and I tried to reply but
> was welcomed the next day with an email that said
> "unable to reach address")


This sounds like your best option. At least give it a try before you give
up on it.


>
> 4. yes it is 40k oriented but hey the 40k list is full of off topics
>that
> don't even say [off topic]


And because their list is stuffed up it's OK for this one too?

I don't think that will be too popular...


Agro

>
> Signed
> Peter the Shadow Inquisitor
>
>
>
>
Received on Sat Jan 10 1998 - 02:59:05 UTC