Re: [Epic] EPIC40k Rumor (Control)

From: Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 07:12:17 -0600 (CST)

On Thu, 13 Feb 1997, oki_at_... wrote:

>
> >>In some ways is got more abstract - Eldar aspects are just aspects. You
> >>can make stands of close-assault aspects & combine banshees, scorpions etc
> >>or support aspects with reapers & dragons.
> >>
>
> >... What? ... WHAT???????? oh my God! I hope this is just a Nightmare!!!!!!
> >You can't do this...please tell me isn't true... oh
> >NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! ...
> >sniff! sniff! my beautiful little game!!!! sob!
> >sniff!.....NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!
> >sigh! sniff!
> >....sorry guys this was too much for me really too much ... sorry again.
>
> Paul, is this true ?

Yeah it's true... there is an extra level of absrtaction in E40k. Andy
and Jervis decided that the differences between a Banshee and a Scorpion
aren't really that much considering the scale of conflict so certain
infantry and vehicles are lumped together.

Ex. A distinction is made bewteen Scorpions/Banshees, then Spiders/Winged
Dudes then "others" and then Exarchs and then Dark Reapers.

Ex2. Gobsmashas, Bowelburnas, and all other tank type Ork vehicles are
lumped under battlewagons.

Ex3. Trygons, Haruspex, and other assault tanks for the Tyranids are
lumped into one Assault Spawn category.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Tobia _O_
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon |
full of tapes hurtling down the highway." (Tanenbaum,1996)
ptobia_at_... http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~heresy
Received on Thu Feb 13 1997 - 13:12:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:07 UTC