COOK MATTHEW JOHN wrote:
>
> > Or releasing a 40K codex with an Epic 40K appendix. That has already
> > been mentioned, by GW I think.
>
> WHERE?
Jervis mentioned the possibility on the 40k list a long
time ago. It seemed to be that he was simply throwing out ideas,
so I wouldn't take this as the "holy truth" and start another "GW
sux" thread, or spread it around as anything but pure rumor.
> I would be VERY annoyed if they did this forcing the 2 games
> togethor.
> I would like to get into 40k if I had the time and money to do so but
> probably never will.
> I suppose if it had all the different armies in then it wouldn't be
> to bad but having to buy a codex that would probably be over #10 just
> to look at the few pages in the back several times would not be my
> idea of fun!
OTOH, a few pages is fairly easy to photocopy/scan...
Personally, I don't see why they just couldn't stick the
army list in WD... But then again, when was the last time you saw
substantial new rules in WD?
Scott Shupe
shupes_at_... shupes@...
http://www.rpi.edu/~shupes
***********************************************************************
"The day will not save them. And we own the the night." - Warmaster
Horus
Received on Wed Feb 18 1998 - 16:50:52 UTC