Andy Skinner wrote:
>
> J. Michael Looney wrote:
> > As it so happens, while I know what the rules say, I do like the
> > detachent at a time assault phase concept.
> >
> > Movement by army, combat by detachments, works for me.
>
> Do you classify movement during assault phase as movement, or combat
> in your above rule o' thumb?
>
That would be combat, just to keep things even.
> If you move and resolve cc/ff a detachment at a time, you'll have to
> have special rules to combine attacks of different detachments. If
> you do all movement for both sides, and then resolve combats one pile at a
> time, it would work.
>
Got to twiddle with this. Let me get back to this with you.
> I still wonder about combining close assaults and firefights, though.
>
Thinking about that one also.
> andy
>
> --
> Andy Skinner
> askinner_at_...
--
Sillyness is the last refuse of the doomed. P. Opus
http://www.spellbooksoftware.com
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d-- s:- a38 US++ P+ L+ E W+++ N++ K++ w++ O- M- V-- PS+ PE++ Y PGP
t++
5 X R+++ tv+ b++++ DI+++ D G+ e+ h--- r+++ y+++(**)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Thu Mar 05 1998 - 15:52:03 UTC