At 03:14 PM 20/2/97 +1100, you wrote:
>>> I realised I mentioned before about not fiddling around with the point cost
>>> system, but in this case (THawk) many seems to think that THawk are
>>> under-priced, if you used it in the following manner:
>>
>> The bottom line is that there are serious problems with the
>>T-hawk as written. All Aaron is stating is that placing a restriction
>>on the kinds of forces you can field is not the correct way to fix
>>this problem. Changing the unit's abilities or cost is a preferred
>>method, as you mention.
>
>Also, the rule about how one unit can snap fire at just one unit (i think
>thats right, but i could be mistaken)
I would say that you are...
Agro
> and each THawk is 1 separate unit.
>Maybe if you take so many of them (say, 3) then they must form a single
>squadron. How does that sound?
>
>doddsy
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Simon Dodds
>c9415355_at_...
>http://www.geocities.com/BourbonStreet/1353/
>
>"I don't need to see the world through rose-coloured glasses, for my
> eyes are naturally bloodshot."
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Feb 20 1997 - 08:46:46 UTC