Keith Zanardi wrote:
> As for making the titans tougher, that would be ok, but I think that this
> can be
> addressed below.
>
> Make all Warlords 300pts, all Reavers 200pts, and all Warhounds
> (individual titans)
> 100pts each. I know it sounds low in price, but follow me here.
-->8--
> The Orks' Great Gargants would be 400pts Slashas 250pts, and Mekboy
> Gargants, 150pts.
>
> Eldar Phantoms would be at 250pts Warlocks at 300pts and Revenants at
> 150pts each.
>
> The Imperator would be 1000pts and the Mega-Gargant (old useless) 600pts.
> These points costs SEEM low, but, I think after some more play testing,
> you would
> all see that this system does in fact work. Titans drop like flies. Titans
> are not
> cheesy, they just are misunderstood.
OK. Compare 2 Warhounds each with 2 Multi Missile Launchers with, say,
an IG Artillery company. 4 barrages for 200 pts and superior
survivability.
Compare 1 Great Gargant with a Squat Land Train. That belly gun has an
excellent chance of KOing the LT in its entirety, regardless of other
factors.
No, I must disagree here. A very impressive huge model should have both
a power, and a cost commensurate with it. The fact that the 'Hells
Angels' can easily take out Titans should be discouraged, not the points
of a Titan adjusted to less than that of a Greater Deamon.
--
aebrain_at_... <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
100026.2014 compuserve o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
See http://www.z-world.com/graphics/z/master/8856.gif for picture
Received on Fri Feb 21 1997 - 10:41:29 UTC
