Re: [Epic] Net Epic (Titan point costs)
>I want to come out in favor of the point system that was posted.
I guess some one has to like it. I sure don't...
Agro
>As I
>only have Warlord Titans :( I was checking how much my battle group
>would cost. I have one Titan armed with two Multiple Rocket Launchers
>and two Volcano Cannons; one armed with two Gatling Blasters, a Volcano
>Cannon, and a Chain Fist; and one armed with a Melta Cannon, a Gatling
>Blaster, a Laser Blaster, and a Volcano Cannon. Would you believe that
>the point total came out to 1800 points? I seem to recall several
>people using this value as a house rule for the cost of a Warlord
>Battle Group based on the "three for the price of two" concept. (BTW,
>note the absence of one-shots. ;]) So IMHO the points balance well.
>
>On the other hand, how do we figure the VPs for a battle group? Do we
>just take the total VPs and divide it between the three Titans? For
>instance, in my example above, would each Titan be worth 6 VPs? Or is
>there another method that would work better?
>
>Another random thought. Some Eldar players have been talking about a
>Warlock Battle Group composed of a Warlock Titan and two Phantoms. I
>could see an Imperial Battle Group composed of a Warlord and two
>Reavers (using the Warlord as a gun platform and the Reavers as
>guards). There could be other combinations of Titans that I'm missing.
> Do we want to allow this or not? It could be done easily with this
>point system. Just an idea.
>
>
>Seth Ben-Ezra
>Great Wolf
>
Received on Wed Feb 26 1997 - 07:42:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:10 UTC