Re: [Epic] What is acceptable.

From: Tyler Provick <bprovick_at_...>
Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 15:35:14 -0400

>
>
> (not really related to the message above, but this is a good as any to
> put it out in the open)
> .
> <rant>
> Gee, can we PLEASE go back to flame wars about targeting rules and army
> morale?
>
> I post 2 LONG things that are 100% on topic, and I don't see even one
> (1) "that's nice, but don't you think 300+ points for a demon is a bit
> high" sort of thing. It's like I posted it to the void. Instead I get
> 20+ plus badly formatted whining about GW and 10+ messages whining about
> people whining about GW then 5+ whining about people whining about
> people whining about GW. I think we even got some 4th level whining in
> there some place. It gets to be a bit of a bother.
>
> Are y'all saying that you don't want me to post army list any more? If
> so, please say so, because I am planing on doing 4-6 more of them this
> week.
> </rant>
>

I agree, I sent 20 people my campaign rules, promised them a spot in the
credits if I post them anywhere, and no-one has any comments except Shervin,
who asked one question, that's it!

They weren't that good people! There should at least be some flames!

Tyler

Oh, and speaking about regulations, perhaps snipping should be implemented.
I couldn't follow the whining war because I didn't know what was old and
what was the reply!
Received on Tue May 26 1998 - 19:35:14 UTC