I found something in 2nd ed. rules. pg 25, "If a titan is hit in Cc,
blah, blah, The enemy may choose the location he wishes to strike at..."
I'm not sure if this resolves the issue, but there it is.
> Darn, looked up the rules and thought "hah, I'll get him". Sure enough,
> couldn't find anything on it. However, I would suggest that the general
> rules on targeting Titans (you can only hit what you can see) would apply
> to CC (you can only hit what you can reach). Really too bad the Q&A died
> out. I really doubt the "guys" are going to be interested in answering
> Epic questions with Epic40k coming out.
>
>
> > Scott
> > shupes_at_...
> >
> > > Going to have to win a
> > > BUNCH of CC to drop a titan that way.
> >
>
> Just the same. Unless you do something screwy it looks tome like the max
> infantry (ground type) you can get into CC with a Warlord is 6 (three per
> foot). If you figure that most bikes/cav have a CAF of 3 the titan isn't
> really in that much trouble. Include Carapace multi Lasers and a CC head
> and you should do just fine. Of course if the Titan is on FF then it has
> nothing to worry about (kill three of the stands and you should be safe).
> If you are upset that you are moving Titans into the middle of the battle
> field (say into a city) and getting swamped by infantry, then you get no
> sympathy from me.
>
> I would suggest that if you go by the "must reach it to damage it" theory
> that Titans will have very little to fear from infantry ground assaults.
> Skimmers of course are another thing, but then they have there own
> problems.
>
> On another front. There was some discussion as to the effects of Void
> shields and CC. I believe that someone stated that void shields protect
> titans when they rush into CC from FF. I believe this is wrong. If I
> remember correctly Void shields do not protect Titans (or knight shields
> protect knights) from the defending FF of units they charge. I think this
> is from Q&A number 2
>
> Just a few thoughts
>
> Chad
--
Johnnemann Nordhagen (jsnord_at_...)
Received on Wed Mar 05 1997 - 01:45:16 UTC