Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 13:27:04 GMT

At 05:22 PM 5/3/97 -0500, you wrote:
>> From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
>>
>> > It seems pretty clear
>> >to me that your proposed interpretation is not what GW intended, especially
>> >considering it doesn't make much sense logically. Non-skimmers can only
>> >hurt the titan if they touch it's feet... but they can never get there since
>> >they'll be pinned at the base... so why even say the bit about the feet
>> >if they can never get there?
>>
>> You can get there IF THE TITAN IS PINNED...
>
> So where does it say that pinning the titan lets other units
>not get pinned by the titan's base? Forgive me if you already answered
>that and I missed it, but it really seems like you're reaching here.
>


It's in the rules on pinning, I'll quote them tomorrow...

Agro



>> >> You CAN get sound tactical advice from this list, but I am disapointed by
>> >> the lack of rules clarification. When I found the list (six month's
ago?) I
>> >> thought "great - now I can find out other people interpret whatever my
>> >> gaming crowd is argueing about at the moment".
>> >
>> > But of course our interpretations are no more valid than anyone else's...
>>
>> I was hoping that they would be more numerous. As you say, the six of us at
>> my end can form an equally valid interpretation to any six of us on the
list...
>
> More numerous or more varied? There are about 140 people on
>the list, although for whatever reasons only about a dozen of us post
>regularly. Presumably the silent majority agrees for the most part
>with members of the vocal minority, and thus feel no need to post
>themselves - so more numerous does not neccessarily mean more varied.
>(or at least, they don't disagree enough to post arguments)
>
>Scott
>shupes_at_...
>
Received on Thu Mar 06 1997 - 13:27:04 UTC