Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Spatula <shupes_at_...>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 1997 14:00:54 -0500

> From: "Cameron Bentsen" <stu7i95_at_...>
>
> In message "[Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)", you write:
>
> > > >> You CAN get sound tactical advice from this list, but I am disapointed by
> > > >> the lack of rules clarification. When I found the list (six month's ago?) I
> > > >> thought "great - now I can find out other people interpret whatever my
> > > >> gaming crowd is argueing about at the moment".
> > > >
> > > > But of course our interpretations are no more valid than anyone else's...
> > >
> > > I was hoping that they would be more numerous. As you say, the six of us at
> > > my end can form an equally valid interpretation to any six of us on the list...
> >
> > More numerous or more varied? There are about 140 people on
> > the list, although for whatever reasons only about a dozen of us post
> > regularly. Presumably the silent majority agrees for the most part
> > with members of the vocal minority, and thus feel no need to post
> > themselves - so more numerous does not neccessarily mean more varied.
> > (or at least, they don't disagree enough to post arguments)
> >
> > Scott
> > shupes_at_...
> >
>
> Speaking for myself, I never thought your idea (about infantry being pinned
> by base-to-base contact with a Titan without being in CC) held any water.

        Agro's idea, not mine. Just wanted to make that clear...

Scott
shupes_at_...
Received on Thu Mar 06 1997 - 19:00:54 UTC