Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...)

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 11:55:09 GMT

At 03:47 PM 8/3/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> Yep, I would be morethan happy to get the only really valid interpretation
>> on this...
>>
>> How about it Allen?
>>
>> Agro
>
>I'd be perfectly happy to go this route, but Jervis and Andy haven't
>answered any mail from me since they began work on EPIC40K late
>last October! I never got any answers back from the last batch of
>questions I sent them then, nor have I had any responses from the
>half dozen or so inquiries I've made over the months since then.
>
>If they wanted to stop answering EPIC questions because a new version
>of the game was coming out and the rules were completely changing,
>I'd perfectly understand. (And my last few inquiries stated this
>fact.) However, I'd have expected to at least have been told that
>my services would no longer be required.

I guess I could try a (snailmail) letter! There is an undertaking in the
front of the base rule set that promises a FAQ service. If I hurry, it will
reach them before the E40K release...

Even if it doesn't, it the (admittedly) contentious interpretation might
picque some interest anyway...

Agro
Received on Tue Mar 11 1997 - 11:55:09 UTC