Re: [Epic] Another contentious issue

From: Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 14:07:58 -0600 (CST)

On Thu, 13 Mar 1997, PAULO ALEXANDRE CORREIA POMBAL(leic) wrote:

> > I realize that. I assumed the titan falling was destroyed, per the rules.
> > But the titan being landed ON is another matter. If the building being
> > landed on has a -5 save, then I think that's justification for a significant
> > amount of potential damage for a titan or gargant being landed on. Maybe
> > 1-3 hits with a -2 save, or 1-6 with a -1 save, or one hit with a -5 save
> > which scatters twice, or something. Incidentally, I also feel that an
> > Imperator class titan might be able to destroy a titan if it falls on it. I
> > can't realy see and imperator bouncing off a Warhound . . .
> >
> > Anyway, these are purely conjectural house rules, which will be mostly
> > useless with E40K.
> >
> Yeah, but probably we still will have the same problem in E40k.

Destroyed War Engines are fully explained in E40k, specifically what
happens to adjacent units.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Tobia _O_
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon |
full of tapes hurtling down the highway." (Tanenbaum,1996)
ptobia_at_... http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~heresy
Received on Thu Mar 13 1997 - 20:07:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:14 UTC