Re: [Epic] Another contentious issue

From: PAULO ALEXANDRE CORREIA POMBAL(leic) <"PAULO>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 17:02:57 +0000 (WET)

On Thu, 13 Mar 1997 duckrvr_at_... wrote:

> I realize that. I assumed the titan falling was destroyed, per the rules.
> But the titan being landed ON is another matter. If the building being
> landed on has a -5 save, then I think that's justification for a significant
> amount of potential damage for a titan or gargant being landed on. Maybe
> 1-3 hits with a -2 save, or 1-6 with a -1 save, or one hit with a -5 save
> which scatters twice, or something. Incidentally, I also feel that an
> Imperator class titan might be able to destroy a titan if it falls on it. I
> can't realy see and imperator bouncing off a Warhound . . .
>
> Anyway, these are purely conjectural house rules, which will be mostly
> useless with E40K.
>
Yeah, but probably we still will have the same problem in E40k.

Paulo Pombal
pacp_at_...
Received on Thu Mar 13 1997 - 17:02:57 UTC