On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Seth Ben-Ezra wrote:
> I had thought about this, but it seems to me that, to an extent, having
> a commander choose his objectives makes sense. Objectives are rather
> abstract. Who knows why one of those areas are important. Maybe one
> of them is a focal point of warp energy, which would be worthwhile for
> Chaos, but pointless for Squats. However, the enemy gets victory
> points for denying the objective to the enemy. Of course, this can be
> abused, but it's not completely illogical.
In E40k each commander can choose the type (with limitations depending on
the scenario) and placement of his/her objectives. All objective types
(except for Rescue) only work for the army that placed them. Of course,
the enemy will want to occupy the objectives to deny them from you. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Tobia _O_
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon |
full of tapes hurtling down the highway." (Tanenbaum,1996)
ptobia_at_...
http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~heresy
Received on Mon Mar 17 1997 - 21:32:17 UTC