>I was a bit harsh, Agro. I wouldn't have necessarily called it brutal, but
>that's just me.
>
>"I love a strong and manly fellowship; one that delights in the rudeness and
>vigor of its intercourse as love does in the bites and scratches that draw
>blood."
> - E. Montaigne (tr. from the French)
You know, I have to agree with this. When I was younger and fitter, there
was nothing better then a strongly fought game of football, cricket,
whatever. The tougher the better. Competition was just great fun. Some of my
best friends were the ones that gave the best challenge. When I hit older
years, debating (once I discovered it wasn't as boring as I thought) became
something similar. You can be very harsh in a debate, within bounds and as
long as it's not personal and keeps to the points within the debate. But I
loved 'em. Religion, Politics the whole kaboodle makes great arguments. The
tougher the fight the better.
Although I think I am a lot different from Temp, I can understand a bit.
>Temp
>
>
>
============================================================
Colonel Abrahms, 22nd NU-Atol Regiment
Rekartot Redbacks Senior Coach
"No Spanky, No. Bad monkey"
=========================================================
email J.Stephensen_at_...
Received on Thu Jan 01 1970 - 00:00:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:17 UTC