Re: [Epic] Epic 40k - answers to our questions!

From: Richard Dewsbery <dewsbery_at_...>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 12:03:43 +0100

Stephen Sheldon wrote:
>
> > >The contra argument is that superheavy weapons are only firepower=1
> > >during firefights. Accordingly, there is no mechanism by which blast
> > >markers affect their shooting, so the titan or land raiders could just
> > >sit there accumulating blast markers while still firing at full effect.
> > >The penalty is that it would have difficulties in any assaults or
> > >firefights, and won't pass any leadership tests in a hurry.
> >
> > The first interpratation (sp?) is correct. Each blast marker stops one
> > super heavy weapon from firing.
> >
> What about a mixed detachment? I presume that players choose, in which
> case HW are never going to be decreased in power.

But the detachment, overall, will be reduced in power - which is the
overall idea.

Richard
Received on Sat Apr 12 1997 - 11:03:43 UTC