Re: [Epic] Knight units in E40K

From: Jeff Schmidt <jschmidt_at_...>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 14:30:48 -0500

>> > I'm against having any seperate rules for the lances. More time than I'd
>> > like to remember we had fights in 2nd ed. whether the lances could be used
>> > or not. Instead I reccomend a higher AV across the board.
>>
>> I agree, special rules seem to be against the feel of this
>> game. How about, if you're in base-to-base contact, you charged. if
>> you aren't, then you didn't charge and only add one to the combined
>> assault of your detachment?

You could say that the knight only gets an AV bonus if the det is on
assault orders. I see assault orders as a general CC readiness (bayonettes
fixed, etc.), as reflected by the half FP / lock-on rules. Knights on
assault orders would have their lances charged and at the ready, regardless
of whether they are charging something or meeting a charge themselves.

I don't have a problem with a general higher AV, either, however. I think
both these solutions are in keeping with the general flavor of E40k.
Comments?

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Schmidt | NetCo Communications Corporation
software engineer, Mac development | 333 N. Washington Ave. Ste. 102
(612) 519-0878 | Minneapolis MN 55401, USA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sun Apr 20 1997 - 19:30:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:21 UTC