Re: [Epic] Rules questions - weapons

From: Mark A Shieh <SHODAN+_at_...>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 18:09:04 -0400 (EDT)

Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...> writes:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Mark A Shieh wrote:
> > Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...> writes:
> > > On Mon, 21 Apr 1997 duckrvr_at_... wrote:
> > > > Slaanesh knights int eh chaos section would be an ideal place to begin.
> > >
> > > That was my intention. :)
> >
> > Likewise, except I felt that it was a good match for the
> > Paladin, Errant, and Lancer, not the others. Also, since we're trying
> > to make a Knight army rather than an Imperial Knight unit, there
> > should be more variety.
>
> As my previous post states I do no think of the Knights as an army onto
> themselves. They're Titan wannabes... people who have dealing with the
> Titan Legions and access to some of their tech, but not titans themselves.
> Unless you're on a Knight world, you're only gonna see Knights in support
> of a Legion or maybe even Tech Guard (itself a supoport arm of the
> Legion).
>
> I think the Knights are a crucial step to making a Titan Legion army, but
> I do not see them as an army of their own. There are War Engines aplenty
> in the Tech Guard and the Legion itself.

        Hrm. Not much to talk about here. I don't think there's a
way to convince you that they are a distinct army, separate from TG,
IG, and SM, so should have a feel of their own. (Which, in Epic 2nd,
tended to be "die".)

Mark
Received on Mon Apr 21 1997 - 22:09:04 UTC