Re: [Epic] New Epic40K?

From: Stephen Sheldon <sheldona_at_...>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 18:05:55 -0700 (PDT)

>
> O.K., I was all set to sell all of my stuff and just forget about all the
> effort I put into this game. Now I've read some of W.D. 208 and gotten a
> better idea of how the game might work. I think I like it. Now I just
> want to know from the rest of you that have gotten it, if I should. I've
> committed a lot of money and time to this hobby since Adeptus Titanicus. I
> lived through the first change. Now it seems like the second is bring the
> game back around to the first edition, which I have to admit I kind of
> liked a little bit more. So what is the lists opinion? Is it worth the
> money to get the game or not?
>
I'm in the same boat as you, I liked AT and SM 1st ed a lot more, but the
rules were quite slow. SM 2nd ed was a good game, but there were too many
MAJOR flaws to it (2 turn games being one), I think if you prefered 1st
ed, E40K is definitely for you. Besides the Buildings make the game
worthwhile....
Has anyone else based up the ruins? I did some of mine, and they look
great...
Steve
Received on Tue Apr 22 1997 - 01:05:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:22 UTC