Folks,
Please stop arguing about this Thunderhawk/Strategy thing - you're
making yourselves look like Rule Lawyers. The Thunderhawk is *so*
embedded into Space Marine (abbreviation: SM - suspect or what?) lore
that there is NO WAY that GW would label it as "ooh - an all-marine
army is strategy 5, but wait! You've got a Thunderhawk - that'll be
you on strategy 4 then". (to paraphrase).
The Imperial Guard would KILL to be able to use a Thunderhawk -
unfortunately they'd have to try and kill Space Marines...
Yes, this is a case of 'Spirit of the rules' and I don't care what the
rulebooks say... unless they back me up of course!
o
-Andy-
p.s.
"...Why is there even a debate? <sigh> Anyway... my vote is to send it
to Jervis.... "
Intriguing: Why debate? Let's get Jerv. to adjudicate. Whatever
happenbed to <ahem> 'lively debate'?
Received on Fri Apr 25 1997 - 09:00:22 UTC