Re: [Epic] Hmmm... SM or IG?

From: Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 13:34:34 -0500 (CDT)

On Tue, 29 Apr 1997, Troy, Kiesten &/or Michael wrote:

> It's me again with the same prob as before. I'm in a pinch at the moment as
> to whether I should start collecting SM or IG in the new E40K range.
> Although I'll be basing the army primarily on Titans and Dreadnoughts (its
> wierd, but I don't like Knights for some reason), I'm not sure which list is
> the best to use as a foundation.
>
> Can anyone *briefly* outline the strengths and weaknesses of the SM and IG
> army lists? I would be most grateful.

SM
----------------------
Strengths:
        - Air Mobile (drop pods, T-hawks)
        - Stubborn
        - Rapid Fire
        - Strategy 5
        - Good Armor
Weaknesses:
        - Regular troops are high cost
        - Few Psykers
        - Only short range arty
        - Strategy bonus is lost with any Imeprial allies

IG
----------------------
Strengths:
        - Artillery, Artillery, Artillery
        - Cheap regular troops
        - Good tanks and transports
        - Did I mention artillery?
Weaknesses:
        - Low troop armor
        - Few Psykers
        - No Assault troop type
        - Terrible strategy (2)

All off the top of my head and all IMO.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Tobia _O_
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon |
full of tapes hurtling down the highway." (Tanenbaum,1996)
ptobia_at_... http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~heresy
Received on Mon Apr 28 1997 - 18:34:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:24 UTC