Re: [Epic] more thoughts on Epic40K

From: Richard Dewsbery <dewsbery_at_...>
Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 00:12:32 +0100

> What? It's still in print, which is more than you could say
> about Blood Bowl or Man O War. Hell, they just released a new book
> (of reprints) for it. Just because they're not releasing a steady
> stream of new figs doesn't mean the game is dead.

The word Scott missed out here was "yet."

GW has a 2 year cycle on the non-core games, and 4-yearly revisions of
the core games. Necromunda IS dead, it just ain't stopped twitching
yet. And in 2 years time, E0k will go the same way.

Richard
Received on Fri May 30 1997 - 23:12:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:31 UTC