Re: [Epic] E40K Squats - Points and Organization

From: Thomas Bloom <tbloom_at_...>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 1997 01:17:33 -0500

>Scott Shupe wrote:
>>
>> Thomas Bloom wrote:
>> >
>> > Your Robots had a D3 AF. Any reason?
>>
>> Possibly to represent whether or not they had the proper
>> orders at the time?
>
>Exactly.
>
>--
>aebrain_at_... <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
>| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
>| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
>100026.2014 compuserve o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
> By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
>See http://www.z-world.com/graphics/z/master/8856.gif for picture

Why not give them a fixed AF, 2 or 3, and make folks "program" thier
robots? Use the same formula as in SM/TL. If enemy in charge range orders
are _______, If in weapon range orders are ________, if in LOS orders are
________, if no enemy orders are _______.

Bit complicated for the 40k version though. Or you could just assume that
the programers knew what they were doing and treat them as any other unit.
Basicly Robots would be Squats version of Dreadnaughts. Eldar Wraithguard
and Dreads lost their restriction on orders (had to be within 10 cm of a
living Eldar). Why not Robots?

Thomas
Received on Thu Jun 05 1997 - 06:17:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:32 UTC