> I disagree. If this is the case, then a single BM halves the effective=
fire
> of a unit of Land Raiders, as usually, they aren't concentrating a =
lot of
> fire. It also halves the fp of an all shw titan if it wants to fi=
re at more
> than one target. At 2 BMs it can only fire at one target.
Ri=
ght. The LRs are better off using their Anti-Tank shots at armour,
rather t=
han as Universal Psyker Assasination on a dozen different units.
This is a =
bad thing?
And as for an all SHW Titan, instead of it being able to assasi=
nate 4
different pykers in 4 different units, it too must concentrate its
f=
irepower on one detachment. Usually another Titan. In fact, it would
encour=
age a mix of weapons. This is a bad thing too?
Actually, we dissallow the =
psycher assination. I.E. SHW's cannot choose to fire at psycers/commanders =
unless they are the closest unit, similar to Sm2. We allow super heavy weap=
ons to target whater kind of troop they want in mixed detachments. (For ins=
tance, I hate whirlwinds :)
-----------------------------------------------=
---------------------------------------------------------------
"Your incor=
rect assumptions are threefold."
"You assume law still reigns in the Five G=
alaxies"
"You assume that we would be bound by precedents and precepts from=
the last 10 million years."
"But your most incorrect assumption of all is =
to assume that we care."
-David Brin, Infinity's Shore
-------------=
----------------------------------------James Nugent-----------------------=
-----------------
- application/ms-tnef attachment: stored
Received on Fri Jun 13 1997 - 11:59:50 UTC