RE: [Epic] Tournament army for review

From: James Nugent <jnug1453_at_...>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 08:07:45 -0400

Greetings All,

        I have a 1000 pt tournament coming in a couple of weeks =
and due the the
scarcity of players in my area it is hard to find someone t=
o playtest
armies against. So I ask for the wisdom of the great wise ones =
on this list.

        My first army was as follows-

HQ +25 185 (50 AF. Mv =
30, charge 45
Aspect +JP,+Aslt,+Psy even bugs look twice.)
Aspect +JP,=
+Aslt x9

HQ +25
Aspect +JP x5 NightSpinner x5 300 (jp so they can =
keep up)
                                                                (suppress the bejeezus out of someone)

Night spi=
nners have such a long range that they don't need to move, and you can't mo=
ve and prep-bombard, although overwathch has it's advantages. :) You could =
get guardians instead of aspects with Jp's, may get more harly's with the p=
oints.

HQ +25 305 (trnspt for Harlies)
Vampire x3
Pheonix x2

Nice a=
ir force, although they only get used every other turn, think of these as a=
rtillary killers. Artillary kills eldar.

ShadowSeer Great Harlequin 20=
7 (cause they look so
Harlequin Squad (2) x3 darn cool. and 58 AF
Harl=
equin squad (2)+Solitaire x2 isnt bad either.)



        Not bad, although i=
t might be nice to have more units on the board, at 1K, you can't have ever=
ything. Much as I hate to admit it, it seems the eldar have been regulated =
to a CC army, withough the numbers or power of Chaos or Tyranids. I miss th=
e days of blowing you opponent away ith devestatingly accurate fire.

----=
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------------
"Your incorrect assumptions are threefold."=

"You assume law still reigns in the Five Galaxies"
"You assume that we wou=
ld be bound by precedents and precepts from the last 10 million years."
"Bu=
t your most incorrect assumption of all is to assume that we care."
                                        =
-David Brin, Infinity's Shore
---------------------------------------------=
--------James Nugent----------------------------------------





Received on Tue Jun 17 1997 - 12:07:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:34 UTC