Kelvin wrote:
> It certainly merits a Mega-Cannon as that is exactly what it is! In 1st Ed.
> the Macro-cannon, as it was called, was a barrage weapon much like the
> Mega-cannon of this edition is. Then when they switched over to the 2nd
> Ed., Quake Cannons, as they became, lost their Barrage ability. Under the
> new rules, they have that ability back again, so I see no reason why the
> Braincrusha can't have an MC as its gun. They have nothing else and should
> have stuff-all AV.
Concur.
> >I am interested in the justification people have to turn the braincrusha
> >into a barrage weapon, because several people have made the suggestion
> >Am I thinking about the wrong unit?
>
> Nope, you just have never seen much of the 1st Ed. and are making you
> decisions based on the 2nd Ed. Nothing wrong with that. But the B.crusha
> has the mother-of-all-guns on it, so it should be suitably impressive.
> That's why I think it warrents a Mega-Cannon.
Concur again. Trouble is, what are the WH40K stats on it?
--
aebrain_at_... <> <> How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain| xxxxx Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia | xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
100026.2014 compuserve o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo oo oo oo
By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
See http://www.z-world.com/graphics/z/master/8856.gif for picture
Received on Fri Jun 27 1997 - 00:48:38 UTC
