>
>At 09:41 30/06/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>----> Don't go to the Imperials to prove something - tons of people seem
>>to be
>>convinced that GW loves them over all others - and hardcore Eldar
>>players are
>>usually out in front leading this charge for some reason - so if you do,
>>try to win
>>using the least interesting and lowest powered units. Otherwise you may
>>be
>>stunned at the outcome -"of course you won - the imperials get all those
>>special rules and cool units - how could you not win ?"
>
>I tend to be one of those that believe that the Imperials get more
>favouratism. My point however in going Imperials in this instance is that
>they too are Imperial. So it follows that if we are playing the same sorts
>of army, that should weed out any advantage due to difference in army.
>
>However he will be getting more experienced with his army and I keep
>changing mine for variety. I suppose the advantage is that I will also have
>a better idea of how to fight against all of the other armies.
>
>TTFN
>Michael
>
-----> Ok, Imperial vs Imperial (who's the traitor?). Guess no one can
whine
about the forces then...
That actually used to be fun - haven't done it yet it E40K , but in 2nd
did I vs
I and Chaos vs Chaos. Tell us how it goes. (I mean, I guess the Imperium
wins, but beyond that...)
>Chris Miller
Received on Thu Jul 03 1997 - 16:15:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:37 UTC