Re: [Epic] My DexCon Epic 40k experiences...

From: Erik K. Rutins <snowdo1_at_...>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 11:47:10 -0400

David,

> I didn't consider either of the armies cheesy. They seemed a good
> mix of troops without any obvious attempt to exploit rules holes. I
> think it's neat that you have your SMs and IG layed out as specific
> units.

Thanks, I like to figure out a roster and then stick to what's
plausible. The best, of course, is to have unit rosters and histories
and then fight a campaign to expand their histories and deeds. If
you're really nuts you can even keep a real regimental history book for
your various units.

> powerful. My personal opinion is that people who look to exploit
> the rules will do so regardless of whether they are restricted to
> on list or several. For example, someone could easily field a

This is true in my experience. Neither of my opponents were into
power-gaming and with each of us having a mixed army, we really had a
lot of fun. It would have been nice to have some other types of
armies, but it didn't detract from the enjoyment of the battles.

Regards,

- Erik

"Look within. Within is the fountain of good, and it will ever bubble
up, if you will ever dig."
- Marcus Aurelius
Received on Tue Jul 08 1997 - 15:47:10 UTC