>Thanks for the report! Sounded like a great battle, consolations on
>you=
r narrow defeat. One question I had as I was reading through
>regarded ini=
tiative in the movement phase. It seemed that every time
>you won initiati=
ve, you moved first and vice-versa for your opponent.
>Since winning initi=
ative allows you to choose who will move first we
>always make the opponent=
take the first move so we can see where he's
>going and react. Do you pla=
y the initiative rules differently or do
>you just prefer to move first?
W=
e play exactly as you do (We pick who moves first) but in this game I had r=
eally commited to the left flank and I wanted to get there as
fast as I co=
uld and manouver to keep the Cult from doing one of those march moves to th=
e next table things :) The slowest memeber of his
Cult of Speed moved 25cm=
so he could quickly outpace me. As for my opponet, he wanted to start the=
retreat after turn 2 to keep from
getting into HtH. What I really need i=
s to paint some of my Assault Spawn to help me with the speed. Thanks.
J=
ust out of curiosity, anyone think there is something wrong with the reinfo=
rcements rules? Since the speed bands are essentially 30 cm and less and th=
ings faster, unfortunlay, nothing is faster than 30 cm except biker detachm=
ents. (and flyers of course) So there is no way to get infantry and tanks e=
arliers, because none are faster than 30 cm? Anyone think this is a little =
odd, I mean you think putting troops in transports would get them to the ba=
ttle quicker.
-------------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------------------------------------
"Your incorrect assumptio=
ns are threefold."
"You assume law still reigns in the Five Galaxies"
"You =
assume that we would be bound by precedents and precepts from the last 10 m=
illion years."
"But your most incorrect assumption of all is to assume that=
we care."
-David Brin, Infinity's Shore
---------------------------=
--------------------------James Nugent-------------------------------------=
---
- application/ms-tnef attachment: stored
Received on Fri Jul 18 1997 - 11:06:21 UTC