RE: [Epic] [E40k] Battle Report

From: James Nugent <jnug1453_at_...>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 1997 12:36:06 -0400

At 02:08 21/07/97 -0600, you wrote:
>[Lesson: Seige artillery is *amazing* for concentrating FP, and can march
>move in the turns it can't fire].

Whoops ... teach me not to read the rules properly. We've been playing that
they can shoot me every turn.

>4) Blast markers didn't play a big part in this battle, with no unit
>keeping more then 1 after the rally phase, and FP not significantly
>reduced.
>
>Troy

I used to think that blast markers didn't play too much of a role in the
game until we started using units which solely dealt out blast markers. I
haven't tried the nightspinners yet, but 16 biovores are really nasty! The
enemy cannot move, cannot shoot and their army morale goes down rapidly.

Nightspinners are to expensive for what they do. Over twice the cost of a biovore.
Personally, don't think they are worth it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Your incorrect assumptions are threefold."
"You assume law still reigns in the Five Galaxies"
"You assume that we would be bound by precedents and precepts from the last 10 million years."
"But your most incorrect assumption of all is to assume that we care."
                                        -David Brin, Infinity's Shore
-----------------------------------------------------James Nugent----------------------------------------





Received on Mon Jul 21 1997 - 16:36:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:39 UTC