RE: Mikes Rant on Orks/ was RE: [Epic] E40K:Battle Report -

From: Ken Taborek <oberon_at_...>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 11:39:30 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, Miller, Chris wrote:

> >For this reason alone, I bet e40k doesn't last long. If they keep to
> >their word, and don't make supplements, they won't get additional money
> >out of the players who already bought the game. Therefore, they will drop
> >the game due to "market considerations".
> >Still, it is a good game, and I'm enjoying it while it lasts.
> >
> >
> >--Ken Taborek oberon_at_...
> >"Show respect for age. Drink good Scotch for a change."- random fortune
> >
> >
> -----> Alone in the wilderness, I cling to my belief that we _will_ see
> some
> kind of expansion box for E40K. GW cannot resist this temptation. If the
> game sells at all well (which is an important qualification right now)
> we
> will see some kind of expansion other than the Dwarf. "But it's complete
> in the box" you say. So was man-o-war - rules for al the races, ships
> etc.
> But they thought of more. They will again. The only hedge I will make is
> that if the game sinks utterly, like space fleet, then we probably will
> not,
> but otherwise, it will come....
>
> Chris Miller
>
> P.S. : What will we see in it? I would guess some psychic rules, some
> kind of alternate flyers & rules, and maybe some campaign stuff.
>
And maybe "official, allowed in tounaments" rules for Squats, Knights, and
other units they overlooked in the re-re-release.

But then they will be going directy against their own statement that there
will be no expansions! They would _never_ do that, would they?

--Ken Taborek oberon_at_...
"Show respect for age. Drink good Scotch for a change."- random fortune
Received on Tue Jul 22 1997 - 15:39:30 UTC