Re: [NetEpic ML] Walkers question

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:02:46 -0500

Hi!

There has always been a bit of a problem defining dreadnoughts. For the most
part they are generally considered infantry for purposes of movement in
terrain types such as woods and buildings, but they are vehicles for the
purposes of transport (they usually cannot be transported like infantry
stands).

Armor saves do not apply as for armored vehicles.

These are mere guidelines however. Your ideas are good too and if they work
use them!

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "AntiChrist" <seimejote_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 12:47 PM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Walkers question


A doubt...

Walkers are treated as Infantry or as Vehicles? In my club we treat
them as hybrids: Infantry for movement (can enter woods/forests, even
at charge rate) and vehicles for all the rest (-1 armor to side, -2
to rear, 180� forward fire arc, cannot enter buildings, etc...).

Is that correct?

Tnx :P



To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Sat Nov 24 2001 - 01:02:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:28 UTC