Re: [NetEpic ML] Chats with Jarvis

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 22:02:54 -0400

Hi!

He's really that negative about the previous version eh? Wierd. I guess all that denial clouds his judgement.

I like you remain to be convinced and while I see the wisdom of jumping to be heard I need to hear from as many people as possible on this list what they think.

<grin> its been a busy weekend on this otherwise qiuet list. Imagine hos it going to be when everybody on the list jumps in on Monday.....

Peter

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Graham Whitehead
  To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
  Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 5:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Chats with Jarvis


  Hi,

  I too have just got back from Fantizan (I wish I'd known you were going Warren, we could have met up!) and had a good chat with Jervis. Apart from a debate over his assertion that before Epic 40,000 came along, there was no strategy or tactics involved in Epic and it was basically just a dice rolling exercise (I tried to put him straight, but he wouldn't have it) we had a good discussion about the new direction. It does seem that he is trying to put more variety into the vehicles again and, looking at the stats sheets for some of the vehicles, the game does seem to be a big advance on E40K. Vehicles are going back to having a variety of weapons fitted, with different strengths and ranges. I remain to be convinced that it will be better than SM/TL or Netepic, but if we nudge him in the right directions you never know :-)

  Graham
Received on Mon Feb 11 2002 - 02:02:54 UTC