--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> He's really that negative about the previous version eh? Wierd. I
guess all that denial clouds his judgement.
* I don't think he HATED the older versions, but he has stated that
he wished the game was more streamlined with less special rules. You
have to admit that Adeptus Titanicus in particular got really silly
with the level of detail for a supposed 1:285 game!
* From his POV Epic40K is the "thinking mans" 40K game and previous
versions were too close to the "grunt level" tabletop 40K then he
probably wished.
* I do absolutely agree that the old games hardly lacked strategy -
certainly more the 40K has these days (either you are shooty or
assault - with no real in-between).
> I like you remain to be convinced and while I see the wisdom of
jumping to be heard I need to hear from as many people as possible on
this list what they think.
* I'm stoked about the whole thing to tell the truth. So stoked I'm
looking at getting a subscription to Fanatic!
* Once we get more feedback we could work on a draft letter from the
entire NetEpic community.
Received on Mon Feb 11 2002 - 03:16:08 UTC